<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What are the Best 4e Ability Score Arrays?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/07/25/what-are-the-best-4e-ability-score-arrays/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/07/25/what-are-the-best-4e-ability-score-arrays/</link>
	<description>Zen and the Art of Roleplaying</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 21:43:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/07/25/what-are-the-best-4e-ability-score-arrays/comment-page-1/#comment-2509</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 21:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=1274#comment-2509</guid>
		<description>@Brett:  Rolling is still an option in 4e (and 3e).  They&#039;re designed with certain assumptions in mind, though -- mainly the one about having at least a +3 modifier, after racials, in the primary stat.  Which doesn&#039;t mean that you can&#039;t play without meeting those assumptions.  Greywulf had a couple of posts about that, a few months back, IIRC.

Personally, I moved away from rolling when it started to interfere with character concepts.  Even something as basic as &quot;I want to play a cleric&quot; could be thwarted by, say, a roll of 5 Wisdom.  The later roll methods, especially &quot;4d6, best 3, arrange as desired&quot;, did a lot to mitigate that, but I still prefer to make the character I envision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brett:  Rolling is still an option in 4e (and 3e).  They&#8217;re designed with certain assumptions in mind, though &#8212; mainly the one about having at least a +3 modifier, after racials, in the primary stat.  Which doesn&#8217;t mean that you can&#8217;t play without meeting those assumptions.  Greywulf had a couple of posts about that, a few months back, IIRC.</p>
<p>Personally, I moved away from rolling when it started to interfere with character concepts.  Even something as basic as &#8220;I want to play a cleric&#8221; could be thwarted by, say, a roll of 5 Wisdom.  The later roll methods, especially &#8220;4d6, best 3, arrange as desired&#8221;, did a lot to mitigate that, but I still prefer to make the character I envision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/07/25/what-are-the-best-4e-ability-score-arrays/comment-page-1/#comment-2506</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=1274#comment-2506</guid>
		<description>Great information. I admit disliking this aspect of the modern game, having a wide spread of stats really did help with the roleplay back in the day, but since it is part of the game now it is nice to have a good handle on some of the math involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great information. I admit disliking this aspect of the modern game, having a wide spread of stats really did help with the roleplay back in the day, but since it is part of the game now it is nice to have a good handle on some of the math involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
