Zero Level, Revisited

A little over a month ago, I proposed a “Zero Level” for 4e for those who would enjoy using the fourth-edition rules yet starting the game at a lower power level.  4e is a minor paradigm shift in that even first-level characters are heroes — it’s the name of the tier.  If a character wasn’t to be a hero, then, he must be somewhere prior to the heroic tier.  Borrowing the zero-level idea from a few editions back and tweaking it to 4e seemed to make sense.

I’m pretty happy with the general idea, but the zero-level I came up with wasn’t quite what I’d wanted.  There was still a pretty stark jump in power level, as several people noted, particularly in the “half hp” to full-first-level-hp switch.  I tried to smooth the progression out a bit, while keeping in mind what the system was representing:  growth of a character from a relatively-normal person (though one with great potential) to a full-fledged hero.  I came to the conclusion that several different points in that continuum needed to be represented in order to fully achieve what I’d pictured.  A pre-heroic tier, if you will, though a very short one.

Initiate

The initiate character is a trained member of his class, but he isn’t yet a hero.  This might be the fighter during his mercenary days, or the wizard after completing his apprenticeship but before embarking on studies of his own, or the paladin newly knighted and not yet tested.  He’s still quite competent in his field, but he lacks the lessons of personal experience that make a first-level fighter, wizard, or paladin what they are.  This level is very similar to my earlier proposal; generation follows the same basic pattern:

1. Choose Race. No changes.
2. Choose Class. Choose a class as usual; however, you lack one of the class features of the class you choose.  See below.  Additionally, you have 2 fewer healing surges.
3. Determine Ability Scores. No changes.
4. Choose Skills. You know one fewer skill.  For example, a cleric knows Religion plus two (rather than three) skills from the list of available class skills.
5. Select Feats. You do not select a feat.
6. Choose Powers. You select at-will powers normally.  You may select an encounter power, but you may only use that power once per day until you reach level 1.  You do not select a daily power.
7. Choose Equipment. The GM may choose to restrict beginning equipment options.
8. Fill in the Numbers. As below.

Your hit points are equal to those of a first-level character minus the amount you would normally gain each level.  For instance, a paladin with 10 Constitution would normally have 25 hit points at first level, and gain 6 for each level thereafter.  Therefore, an Initiate Paladin with 10 Constitution has 25 – 6 = 19 hp.  At first level, he gains 6 hp, bringing him to the normal total of 25.

Your bonuses are affected by your status.  Treat “half your level” as “-1.”

You are “missing” one class feature.  It is up to the player and GM to agree on which one, but it’s best to try to ensure that the character will be able to perform the basic functions of his role.  For instance, a cleric should probably not “lose” Healing Word.  The GM may wish to restrict Ritual Casting at this level, since you’re technically not level 1 yet.  If he does, this does not count as the class feature you “lose” — you must still choose a different class feature to “give up.”

You must gain 500 xp to become a first-level character.  At that time, you gain your “missing” class feature and all of the other benefits of being a first-level hero (extra hp and healing surges, a feat, the “missing” skill, etc.)  You may also retrain when gaining first level, as you normally would when gaining a level.

Novice

The novice is the fledgling adventurer, possessed of the rudiments of training in his class but lacking the sheer skill or power that even a first-level hero wields casually.  There is still some quality that sets him apart — he learns quickly, perhaps, or has a great degree of natural talent — but he has yet to refine his abilities.  This is the wizard as an apprentice or the knight as a squire.

A novice character is created in a similar manner, but the restrictions are even harsher.  A novice has only one class feature — a defining one, as agreed upon by the player and the GM.  (Classes with particularly weak features that are nevertheless central to their concept may have two, if the GM permits.  For instance, the Bard should probably have Skill Versatility in addition to another feature.)

A novice also has two fewer healing surges than an initiate (four fewer than a first-level character), and “loses” another level’s worth of hit points.  The 10-Con Paladin above would possess 25 – 6 – 6 = 13 hp as a Novice Paladin.  A Novice Wizard with 8 Constitution would possess 10 hit points (18 – 4 – 4 ).  Clearly, novice characters are extremely fragile and will have to be very careful about adventuring.  If you use a character-creation method that would allow a lower Constitution score, then 1 hit point is a minimum.

A novice character has one at-will power — he’s mastered one basic trick of his profession.  He also knows one encounter power, but he may only use it once per day, and only after spending an action point during the encounter; he is pushing himself to his limits in order to pull off an advanced technique that he hasn’t quite mastered yet.  At the GM’s option, the character may use this power without spending an action point, but with the addition of some adverse or unforeseen side effect.

As a novice character, you treat “half your level” as -”2.”

The GM may wish to remove an additional trained skill from a novice character, but I don’t recommend it; they’re pretty limited already.

You must gain 250 xp to become an initiate character.  At that time, you gain all of the benefits of an initiate character, and you may retrain.

Contest: Win an Open Game Table Anthology

I’m giving away a copy of the Open Game Table Anthology I fanboyed about yesterday.  To enter, all you need to do is comment on this post and reply to the questions below.  Since the book’s point is to collect some of the best blog posts of 2008, it seems like a suitable bribe prize for helping me to improve my blog.  Gotta keep 2009 in mind, after all.  The Anthology will go to the author of the comment I judge best.  The deadline is Saturday, April 11 — one week from today Wednesday, April 15.  So at least something good will come of tax day.  (Edit:  Extended the deadline a little, because I forgot to account for the Easter holiday.  I’m traveling that weekend.)

1. What would you like to see more of?  What’s your favorite type of blog post to read?  What do you find most useful?
2. What can I improve?  What, if anything, would you like to see less of?  What, if anything, would you like to see more of, if only I’d do it the right way (and what am I getting wrong)?
3. Is there anything non-content-related that I should take note of?
4. What’s your favorite game system at the moment, and what do you like best about it?
5. If you play or run 4e, and you had the power to see one supplement or module published for it, what would you want to see, and why?  (If you don’t play or run 4e, just say so.  It won’t hurt your chances.)

That’s it.  If you’ve already got a copy of the Anthology, please, enter anyway; I’m entirely willing to send a copy to someone you designate, as a gift, or to find you an alternative prize if you’d prefer.  Also, yes, I will ship it internationally, although you may be waiting a little while for the delivery…

Review: Open Game Table Anthology, Volume 1

I’ve mentioned Open Game Table: The Anthology of Roleplaying Game Blogs, Volume 1 before, but last week I got my hands on the hard copy and set to reading it.  The long and the short of it:  It met my expectations (and they were high) in every way.

Jonathan Jacobs, of The Core Mechanic, brought the project together quickly and professionally.  He’d probably be the first to tell you he didn’t do it alone, but the time and effort he put into this went way beyond a couple of blog posts — not just collecting the various posts that went into the anthology, but rounding up some artist volunteers, investigating means of distributing the final product, even getting Wolfgang Baur to write a foreword.  That shows in the quality of the finished book.  This is a professional product.  A round of applause here for him.

So, what’s in the book?

Continue reading »

RPG Blog Carnival, April 2009: Humor and Gaming

The RPG Blog Carnival is pitching its tents here at A Butterfly Dreaming this month, and in honor of the day and the Dragon magazines of my youth, I say:

Send in the clowns!

Last month was hosted by The Book of Rev, on the topic of war, so to wind down, we’ll be taking a look at the lighter side this month.  The topic is Humor.  Silly items or monsters you’ve created for your games, parodies, funny stories about things your characters did, reviews of humor-based RPGs.  If it has to do with roleplaying games and it’s funny, it’s in.

Once you’ve got your post up, please comment on this article with a link back so that I can more easily include it in the Roundup at the end of the month.  Linking to this page should automatically generate a trackback, too, but I make no guarantees.

And remember to check out the previous RPG Blog Carnivals:

• August 2008:  The Core Mechanic: Death and Undeath
• September 2008:  The Fine Art of the TPK: Homebrew
• October 2008:  Musings of the Chatty DM: Superheroes
• November 2008:  The Dice Bag: Religion
• December 2008:  Critical Hits: Transitions and Transformations
• January 2009:  Unclebear: New Years Gaming Goals and Resolutions
• February 2009:  The Core Mechanic: Monsters and Maps
• March 2009:  The Book of Rev: War