<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Action!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/04/21/action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/04/21/action/</link>
	<description>Zen and the Art of Roleplaying</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:43:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/04/21/action/comment-page-1/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=128#comment-423</guid>
		<description>@Jonathan:  Thanks... and no problem.  I would&#039;ve assumed as much.  You&#039;ve always struck me as a pretty conscientious sort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonathan:  Thanks&#8230; and no problem.  I would&#8217;ve assumed as much.  You&#8217;ve always struck me as a pretty conscientious sort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/04/21/action/comment-page-1/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=128#comment-421</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s been some concern over at the RPG Bloggers google group that the author&#039;s work is being submitted without their consent - so I just want to clarify: Nothing will be published in Open Game Table unless the author releases the material for inclusion in the Anthology. This post was simply submitted for consideration; which is the first step towards identifying the best in RPG blogging. Let me know if you have any questions over at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://thecoremechanic.blogspot.com/2008/10/open-game-table-2008-anthology-of-role.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Core Mechanic&lt;/a&gt; or in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://groups.google.com/group/open-game-table?hl=en&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OPEN GAME TABLE google group&lt;/a&gt;. I hope that this clears up any confusion you may have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been some concern over at the RPG Bloggers google group that the author&#8217;s work is being submitted without their consent &#8211; so I just want to clarify: Nothing will be published in Open Game Table unless the author releases the material for inclusion in the Anthology. This post was simply submitted for consideration; which is the first step towards identifying the best in RPG blogging. Let me know if you have any questions over at the <a href="http://thecoremechanic.blogspot.com/2008/10/open-game-table-2008-anthology-of-role.html" rel="nofollow">The Core Mechanic</a> or in the <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/open-game-table?hl=en" rel="nofollow">OPEN GAME TABLE google group</a>. I hope that this clears up any confusion you may have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/04/21/action/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=128#comment-418</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m submitting this post to &lt;a href=&quot;http://thecoremechanic.blogspot.com/2008/10/open-game-table-submission-form.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OPEN GAME TABLE&lt;/a&gt; for consideration because... its awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m submitting this post to <a href="http://thecoremechanic.blogspot.com/2008/10/open-game-table-submission-form.html" rel="nofollow">OPEN GAME TABLE</a> for consideration because&#8230; its awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheLemming</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/04/21/action/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>TheLemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=128#comment-87</guid>
		<description>You can check the rules out at http://d20srd.org - most of the unearthed arcana went into the SRD - and the whole action points section is online there!

TheLemming&#039;s last blog post: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.lemmi.at/?p=293&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Temptations of Evil - Part Two: Evil in Group(s)&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can check the rules out at <a href="http://d20srd.org" rel="nofollow">http://d20srd.org</a> &#8211; most of the unearthed arcana went into the SRD &#8211; and the whole action points section is online there!</p>
<p>TheLemming&#8217;s last blog post: <a href="http://blog.lemmi.at/?p=293" rel="nofollow">Temptations of Evil &#8211; Part Two: Evil in Group(s)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/04/21/action/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=128#comment-82</guid>
		<description>@Lemming:  Thanks for the correction, then.  I might need to track down a copy of that, now that the 3.5 books are going cheap.

@ScottM:  Someone in Chatty&#039;s thread had proposed a parallel system of &quot;Style Points&quot; -- I like to keep the bookkeeping simple though.  There was also a mention of another game in which the GM could force the player to explain an action in more detail by handing out an action point, which is an option I&#039;m considering taking up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lemming:  Thanks for the correction, then.  I might need to track down a copy of that, now that the 3.5 books are going cheap.</p>
<p>@ScottM:  Someone in Chatty&#8217;s thread had proposed a parallel system of &#8220;Style Points&#8221; &#8212; I like to keep the bookkeeping simple though.  There was also a mention of another game in which the GM could force the player to explain an action in more detail by handing out an action point, which is an option I&#8217;m considering taking up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottM</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/04/21/action/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=128#comment-81</guid>
		<description>I like this implementation, though I admit that I&#039;m not sure I&#039;d use action points as the driver. Though, if I&#039;m playing D&amp;D (rather than Spirit of the Century or Adventure, which have this idea built in) I can&#039;t think of a better substitution and suspect it&#039;d grow into a whole subsystem if I let it.

Sounds like it&#039;s time to playtest it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this implementation, though I admit that I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d use action points as the driver. Though, if I&#8217;m playing D&amp;D (rather than Spirit of the Century or Adventure, which have this idea built in) I can&#8217;t think of a better substitution and suspect it&#8217;d grow into a whole subsystem if I let it.</p>
<p>Sounds like it&#8217;s time to playtest it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheLemming</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/04/21/action/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>TheLemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=128#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Sorry edit function is broken here at work... *cough*

http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/adventuring/actionPoints.htm - I remembered Unearthed Arcana was incorporated into the d20srd - and even the whole actionpoints section can be found there.

TheLemming&#039;s last blog post: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.lemmi.at/?p=293&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Temptations of Evil - Part Two: Evil in Group(s)&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry edit function is broken here at work&#8230; *cough*</p>
<p><a href="http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/adventuring/actionPoints.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.d20srd.org/srd/variant/adventuring/actionPoints.htm</a> &#8211; I remembered Unearthed Arcana was incorporated into the d20srd &#8211; and even the whole actionpoints section can be found there.</p>
<p>TheLemming&#8217;s last blog post: <a href="http://blog.lemmi.at/?p=293" rel="nofollow">Temptations of Evil &#8211; Part Two: Evil in Group(s)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheLemming</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/04/21/action/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>TheLemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=128#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott,
they were optional as everything in Unearthed Arcana - but still official (Wizards) material - still the options were a lot more and I think the system is more in the fluff direction than the current one - which is less fluff. :)

TheLemming&#039;s last blog post: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.lemmi.at/?p=293&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Temptations of Evil - Part Two: Evil in Group(s)&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott,<br />
they were optional as everything in Unearthed Arcana &#8211; but still official (Wizards) material &#8211; still the options were a lot more and I think the system is more in the fluff direction than the current one &#8211; which is less fluff. <img src='http://abutterflydreaming.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>TheLemming&#8217;s last blog post: <a href="http://blog.lemmi.at/?p=293" rel="nofollow">Temptations of Evil &#8211; Part Two: Evil in Group(s)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/04/21/action/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=128#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I never picked that one up.  But I was under the impression that Unearthed Arcana was a book of optional rules.  (Well, all rules are optional.  Read &quot;rules that aren&#039;t necessarily expected to be part of a regular D&amp;D game,&quot; I suppose.)

If 3.5 did incorporate action points into its official system, I stand corrected.

I do seem to recall something similar in 2e, although I&#039;m not sure whether that was from an optional sourcebook or from our group&#039;s house rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never picked that one up.  But I was under the impression that Unearthed Arcana was a book of optional rules.  (Well, all rules are optional.  Read &#8220;rules that aren&#8217;t necessarily expected to be part of a regular D&#038;D game,&#8221; I suppose.)</p>
<p>If 3.5 did incorporate action points into its official system, I stand corrected.</p>
<p>I do seem to recall something similar in 2e, although I&#8217;m not sure whether that was from an optional sourcebook or from our group&#8217;s house rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheLemming</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2009/04/21/action/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>TheLemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=128#comment-76</guid>
		<description>&quot;Officially including them is a first for D&amp;D, though, and a welcome one.&quot;

While I think it&#039;s a great addition, I have to say even from the offical materials available, this has been introduced in a (not 100% similiar) way back with Wizards official material Unearthed Arcana (check page 122 if you got a copy). If I remember it correctly the idea itself has been around in non-core material before as well.
The approach (for the 3.5 system) was adding a smaller die (1d6-3d6) to make sure you got a better chance for a higher outcome, or ignore the miss chance with blind figthing for one round or ... Monte did an outstanding job on the book and I hope you give it credit here :). [for me it is and was the best approach to action points so far]

TheLemming&#039;s last blog post: &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.lemmi.at/?p=293&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Temptations of Evil - Part Two: Evil in Group(s)&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Officially including them is a first for D&amp;D, though, and a welcome one.&#8221;</p>
<p>While I think it&#8217;s a great addition, I have to say even from the offical materials available, this has been introduced in a (not 100% similiar) way back with Wizards official material Unearthed Arcana (check page 122 if you got a copy). If I remember it correctly the idea itself has been around in non-core material before as well.<br />
The approach (for the 3.5 system) was adding a smaller die (1d6-3d6) to make sure you got a better chance for a higher outcome, or ignore the miss chance with blind figthing for one round or &#8230; Monte did an outstanding job on the book and I hope you give it credit here <img src='http://abutterflydreaming.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . [for me it is and was the best approach to action points so far]</p>
<p>TheLemming&#8217;s last blog post: <a href="http://blog.lemmi.at/?p=293" rel="nofollow">Temptations of Evil &#8211; Part Two: Evil in Group(s)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
