Comments on: Review: Player’s Handbook 2

By: Mais uma coletânea de Links | Rolando 20 - D&D 4ª edição

Mais uma coletânea de Links | Rolando 20 - D&D 4ª edição — Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:15:35 +0000

[...] A Butterfly Gaming [...]

By: Wimwick

Wimwick — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:59:29 +0000

I updated the Character Builder the other day and started taking a look at the new options. Based on what I've read so far I'm inclined to agree with your points. Avenger, Bard, Invoker and Sorceror look great the others are a miss for me. I agree that the Shifter is basically a reprint from the MM which is too bad. Wimwick´s last blog post: The Spoils of War

By: Scott

Scott — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:55:30 +0000

I kind of like the Warden, but it just doesn’t have the flavor of the divine or arcane classes presented in the book. Bards were well-done, although the concept is still pretty silly in most cases. I like the Sorcerer, which is now a class of its own instead of a Wizard variant, but I don’t think I would play one; the raw-power approach usually isn’t my style. (One of the reasons I’m not that keen on the Barbarian, for that matter, although the new rage system is cool.)

By: Wyatt

Wyatt — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:49:01 +0000

I also felt the PHB2 was weaker as a whole. The Divine Classes stole the show for me – I really wanted to love Primal, but a lot of it was bland and didn't attract my attention. Druid was the only one I really liked. Shaman was the biggest disappointment. I'd buy it just for the Invoker and Avenger but not for much more. Wyatt´s last blog post: Celebrating 10,000 hits in…