<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barbarians at the Gates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abutterflydreaming.com/2008/10/10/barbarians-at-the-gates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2008/10/10/barbarians-at-the-gates/</link>
	<description>Zen and the Art of Roleplaying</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 08:37:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel Beaudoin</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2008/10/10/barbarians-at-the-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel Beaudoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=399#comment-397</guid>
		<description>If you have any of the october Dragon articles that interest you, it might not be a bad idea to get them this weekend. According to the post by Solice here (http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=1099501) the transition to subscription status could be as early as tuesday. And as soon as it goes subscription, access to the other articles for october that *was* free will be lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have any of the october Dragon articles that interest you, it might not be a bad idea to get them this weekend. According to the post by Solice here (<a href="http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=1099501" rel="nofollow">http://forums.gleemax.com/showthread.php?t=1099501</a>) the transition to subscription status could be as early as tuesday. And as soon as it goes subscription, access to the other articles for october that *was* free will be lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wyatt</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2008/10/10/barbarians-at-the-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=399#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Most of the things I&#039;ve read from Gleemax and suchlike actually pin the Barbarian as weaker damage-wise compared to a properly built rogue or ranger...but on the plus, it seems far easier to &quot;properly build&quot; (IE bend the mechanics right over) on a Barbarian for damage output (since it&#039;s practically all it DOES). 

To be honest I was all &quot;WOW&quot; at first, but now it&#039;s not gripping me much. Then again, I&#039;m also one of &quot;those&quot; people who looked at the Swordmage and squeed with the crowd for a while then went back to the Core 8 classes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the things I&#8217;ve read from Gleemax and suchlike actually pin the Barbarian as weaker damage-wise compared to a properly built rogue or ranger&#8230;but on the plus, it seems far easier to &#8220;properly build&#8221; (IE bend the mechanics right over) on a Barbarian for damage output (since it&#8217;s practically all it DOES). </p>
<p>To be honest I was all &#8220;WOW&#8221; at first, but now it&#8217;s not gripping me much. Then again, I&#8217;m also one of &#8220;those&#8221; people who looked at the Swordmage and squeed with the crowd for a while then went back to the Core 8 classes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2008/10/10/barbarians-at-the-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 01:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=399#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Ah, that&#039;s excellent news.

Too bad the rest of Dragon isn&#039;t.  I&#039;ve enjoyed many of the articles, but the price seems awfully high to me, considering how little D&amp;Di seems to offer other than that.  Maybe I&#039;ll reconsider when, and if, they get more of the content up and running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, that&#8217;s excellent news.</p>
<p>Too bad the rest of Dragon isn&#8217;t.  I&#8217;ve enjoyed many of the articles, but the price seems awfully high to me, considering how little D&#038;Di seems to offer other than that.  Maybe I&#8217;ll reconsider when, and if, they get more of the content up and running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel Beaudoin</title>
		<link>http://abutterflydreaming.com/2008/10/10/barbarians-at-the-gates/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel Beaudoin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abutterflydreaming.com/?p=399#comment-394</guid>
		<description>Solice (WotC Community Manager) has confirmed that the barbarian playtest article is going to remain free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solice (WotC Community Manager) has confirmed that the barbarian playtest article is going to remain free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

